Legal Opinion
Stuttgart Rice Mill Co. v. Crandall
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 8, 1941No. 4-6612PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal questions constitutionality of Act 29, approved February 6, 1941, designated by the general assembly as Rice Development Commission Law. It authorizes the governor to appoint five commissioners, not less than three of whom shall be rice growers, and two of whom may be rice millers.1
A tax of two cents per hundred pounds on rice milled within the state is levied, effective after August 1, 1941; contingent, however, upon adoption by Texas of a similar statute.
The plan is borrowed from a Louisiana act, approved July 10, 1940. Texas enacted a measure at variance with those of Louisiana…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. LordSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Wiseman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Torigian v. SaundersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Wilkins v. City of HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Melton v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- McGriff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.