Legal Opinion

Miller Conditional Use Application (After Remand)

Vermont Superior Court

Decided November 5, 2007No. 59-03-07 VtecPublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } In re: Miller Conditional Use Application } Docket No. 59-3-07 Vtec (After Remand) } } Decision On The Record Appellants Charles C. Miller, Jr. and Carole B. Miller (“Appellants”) appealed from a decision of the Town and Village of Ludlow Development Review Board (“DRB”), denying their conditional use application. Appellants are represented by Martin Nitka, Esq. The Town and Village of Ludlow (“Ludlow”) is represented by J. Christopher Callahan, Esq. Now pending in this on-the-record appeal is Appellants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Ludlow’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Chioffi v. Winooski Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  4. In Re PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API