Chioffi v. Winooski Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a decision by the Chittenden Superior Court holding unconstitutional the de novo trial provision of 24 V.S.A. § 4472. We reverse.
I
The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff sought a dimensional variance and conditional use approval prior to reconstructing a substantially fire-damaged structure in the City of Winooski. After a hearing, the Winooski Zoning Board (Board) denied plaintiff’s request because plaintiff had not shown compliance with the conditional use criteria, and because, due to the lapse of more than twelve months following the fire, reconstruction rights…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- In Re PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- State of Vermont Department of Taxes v. Tri-State Industrial Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Berlin Convalescent Center, Inc. v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.