Legal Opinion
Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Securities Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 20, 1942No. 129PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission declaring petitioner, Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., to be an affiliate of the Dayton Power & Light Co. for the purpose of denying underwriting fees to petitioner in connection with a refunding operation of Dayton. This order was issued pursuant to Rule U-12F-2 of the Commission under the Public Utility Holding Company Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79a et seq. Petitioner urges that the record lacks substantial evidence to support the order, and that the Rule is invalid under the Act. We do not agree…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Associated Industries of New York State, Inc. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.