Trupp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
This appeal concerns a provision in a policy of uninsured/underinsured motorist insurance that provides that an arbitration award not exceeding the limits of the financial responsibility law—R.C. 3937.18(A)—is binding upon both parties, but an arbitration award in excess of those limits is appealable de novo by either party. We agree with plaintiff-appellant, Carl Trupp, that that provision is unconscionable because, in cases in which the insured’s realistic expectation is an award in excess of the financial responsibility law limits, but the insurer’s realistic expectation is an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Dayton Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Dayton Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hiller v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
- Monarch Construction Co. v. Ohio School Facilities Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2002