Legal Opinion

MidTexas Pipeline Co. v. Dernehl

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided February 26, 2002No. 06-01-00010-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

MidTexas Pipeline Company appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of Wilbert 0. Dernehl and the First National Bank of Bellville (collectively, Dernehl). MidTexas is a gas corporation with the right of condemnation under Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 181.004 (Vernon 1998). Mid-Texas began negotiations with Dernehl to purchase an easement over his land for the purpose of building a natural gas pipeline.

After negotiations yielded no agreement, MidTexas filed a condemnation action pursuant to Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 21.012 (Vernon 1984). The trial court appointed special…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. White v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pitts v. Sabine River Authority of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Harrison Interests, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  5. MidTexas Pipeline Co. v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API