Legal Opinion
ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Bell
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided October 10, 2002No. 01-01-00153-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM NUCHIA, Justice.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On March 1, 1995, the board of directors of appellant, ExxonMobil, passed a resolution determining that there was a public necessity to construct a common carrier pipeline from Katy Gas Plant in Waller County, Texas, through Fort Bend County to a location in Brazoria County. Exxon-Mobil negotiated with appellee, William S. Bell, to acquire an easement for its common carrier pipeline. On May 11, 1995, ExxonMobil made a final offer to Bell for the easement and ancillary rights it was taking. The offer was for (1) the condemnable easement, (2) the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas Highway Department v. WeberTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Mercier v. MidTexas Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- State v. Schmidt, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- MidTexas Pipeline Co. v. Dernehl, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Asshauer v. Wells Fargo Foothill, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Williamson v. Guadalupe County Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
- Richard Williford, Trustee v. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- Terrance J. Hlavinka, Kenneth Hlavinka, Tres Bayou Farms, Lp, and Terrance Hlavinka Cattle Company v. Hsc Pipeline Partnership, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2022