Dilworth & Marshall v. Kirby
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County ; R. B. I». Roy, Judge. Suit by A. H. Kirby, receiver of the Equitable Company, Incorporated, against Dil-worth & Marshall. Prom an order perpetuating a temporary injunction, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts in this case material to our conclusion are that the appellee, A. H. Kirby, was duly appointed, by the district court of the Seventeenth judicial district of Tarrant county, receiver of the property of the Equitable Company, Inc., and as such took possession thereof. The property consisted in part of several hundred town lots in the city of San Antonio. Thereafter, on the _____ day of March, 1923, Messrs. Dilworth and Marshall, a firm of attorneys in San Antonio, filed suit in the Seventy-Third district court of their county against the receiver, Kirby, and said Equitable Company…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Dillingham v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kirby v. Dilworth & MarshallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Nelson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Eaton v. WhisenantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Lubbock Independent School Dist. v. Lubbock Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Wright v. LynskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926