Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Whisenant
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 7, 1932No. 11241PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.
On September 9, 1931, the Ninety-Fifth district court of Dallas county appointed Herbert W. Whisenant receiver of the assets of John W. Hooser, and among other -properties talcen possession of by the receiver, were three oil leases on lands in Rusk county, Tex., that is, a 20-acre tract designated Hooser-Eaton A, a 21.52-acre tract designated Hooser-Eaton B, and a 10-aere tract designated Hooser-Eaton C. G. W. Eaton and wife, Martha Elizabeth Eaton, owners, leased the lands for oil and gas purposes, and Hooser’s claims to the leases were acquired by and under successive assignments from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kirby v. Dilworth & MarshallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Paine v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Bowles v. MitchellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Dilworth & Marshall v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Garrison v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCurdy v. GageTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- Lubbock Hotel Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- McCurdy v. GageTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Baylor University v. Chester Sav. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Prince v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.