Legal Opinion

Matter of S.S.T.B. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A receiver of the property and effects of the above named corporation was duly appointed by a Special Term of the Supreme Court of the state, sitting at Albany on the 31st of July, 1891, and the order appointing him was filed and entered in the proper clerk's office August 1, 1891, at 11 A.M. The receiver executed his bond and it was duly approved August third, and filed in the clerk's office August 4, 1891. The proceeding was one for the voluntary dissolution of a corporation and the distribution of its property and assets among those entitled to receive the same. Intermediate the time when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Texas Trunk Ry. Co. v. Lewis, SheriffTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Albany City Bank v. SchermerhornNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  4. Porter v. . Williams and ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Van Alstyne v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Strother v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
  5. In re Lengert Wagon Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API