Van Alstyne v. . Cook
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The omission of the clerk to sign the judgment roll on entering up the judgment of the Artisans' Bank against Treadwells, Perry Norton, does not affect the validity of the judgment. It was a clerical error, and a mere question of practice and of regularity, which the Supreme Court could and should at any time have allowed to have been amended, nunc pro tunc. And the levy made by the plaintiff upon the execution issued on said judgment was entirely regular and valid, and created a perfect lien upon the property levied on in favor of the plaintiff in the execution, if the property at the time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Innes v. LansingNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Whitewright v. StimpsonNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Rutter v. TallisThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
- Huff v. KnappThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
3Cited by35 opinions
- Lopez v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Varnum v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- American Clay MacHinery Co. v. New England Brick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Jackson v. LaheeIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Davenport v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.