Legal Opinion

State v. Bunch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1987No. 55188S; CA A41731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this DUII case, defendant contends that he should have been permitted to assert as a defense that he was involuntarily intoxicated. In State v. Maguire, 78 Or App 459, 717 P2d 226 (1986), we held that driving under the influence of intoxicants, former ORS 487.540,1 is a strict liability crime and does not require a culpable mental state. On review, the Supreme Court, by an equally divided court, affirmed without opinion. 303 Or 368, 736 P2d 193 (1987).

We affirm, relying on our reasoning in State v. Maguire, supra.

Affirmed.

The present statute, ORS 813.010, applicable to this case, does not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MaguireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. MaguireOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API