Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1990No. DC 880117M; CA A48812; SC S36077Published
1Opinion of the Court
788 P.2d 974 (1990)
309 Or. 362
STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review,
v.
Les Lee MILLER, Petitioner On Review.
DC 880117M; CA A48812; SC S36077.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted June 13, 1989.
Decided March 6, 1990.
Henry M. Silberblatt, Salem, for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for respondent on review. With him on the response to the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before PETERSON, C.J., and LINDE,[*] CARSON, JONES, GILLETTE, VAN…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Carson; Dissent · Fadeley.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.