Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 1989No. 880117M; CA A48812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, defendant argues that he should have been allowed to assert the defense of involuntary intoxication. He asks us to reconsider our opinion in State v. Maguire, 78 Or App 459, 717 P2d 226 (1986), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court, 303 Or 368, 736 P2d 193 (1987), in which we held that DUII is a strict liability offense. We decline to do so. See State v. Bunch, 87 Or App 386, 387, 742 P2d 74 (1987).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MaguireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. MaguireOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990