Legal Opinion
McKnight v. Webster
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-1280, 80-1267PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Plaintiff in these pro se actions is a federal prisoner who seeks to have expunged from records maintained by the FBI and local police notations of certain of his arrests by local law enforcement authorities. McKnight contends that he is entitled to expunction on the ground that some of the challenged arrests were in violation of his constitutional rights, and others did not re- suit in a judgment of conviction against him. Defendants are federal officials charged by Congress with the duty to maintain records of arrest and the police chiefs for the localities in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dale B. Menard v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of the United States and Clarence M. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- John Brent Tarlton, Jr. v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Hughes v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Tarlton v. SaxbeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sony Corporation v. Elm State Electronics, Inc. And Richard GurtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Jimenez v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Beeman v. BeemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Connell v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Mileasing Co. v. Allavena (In Re Allavena)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.