Legal Opinion
Connecticut Bank Trust v. Glenn, No. Cv 27 91 00 (May 24, 1993)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 24, 1993No. CV 27 91 00Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ARTICULATION (NO. 118) "Summary judgment is a method of resolving litigation when pleadings, affidavits, and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. CT Page 5035 Practice Book 380." Wilson v. New Haven, 213 Conn. 277, 279,567 A.2d 829 (1989). "In ruling on a motion for summary judgment the court's function is not to decide issues of material fact, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Reid & Riege, P.C. v. Brainerd Cashman Insurance Agency, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992