Legal Opinion
Reid & Riege, P.C. v. Brainerd Cashman Insurance Agency, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 1992No. 10238PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff, a professional corporation, instituted this action seeking a judgment declaring that garnishments served on it by the defendant Kwik Care were ineffective and invalid. The defendant Kwik Care,1 doing business as VIP Health Care, appeals from the judgment ordered by the court following its granting of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The defendant claims that the court improperly found that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The court found…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bristol Savings Bank v. SilverDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Kosloff v. Fairfield County Boy Scouts, No. Cv 0280331 (Sep. 30, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- 669 Atlantic St. v. Atlantic-Rockland, No. Cv90 0110249 S (Apr. 11, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Afflerbach v. Furry, No. Cv 89-0367207s (Nov. 9, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Connecticut Bank Trust v. Glenn, No. Cv 27 91 00 (May 24, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.