Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Buselaki

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1935PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

This is a proceeding brought by the city of St. Louis under Ordinance No. 38,649 to condemn property for a public highway to be known as route No. 99 and for the establishment' of a traffic circle at the street intersection formed by the convergence, near the northern limits of the city, of Halls Ferry road, Goodfellow Avenue and Kingshigkway Northwest. The map below shows the

location of the properties of respondents which are affected by the appropriation.

At the date of the appropriation, August 9, 1930, the effective date of the ordinance, all the converging highways, except No. 99, had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Young v. WheelockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Sullivan v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Spencer v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. ShippSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. City of St. Louis v. VasquezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Kirst v. Clarkson Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Bloomfield Tractor Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Empire District Electric Co. v. JohnstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API