Legal Opinion
Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'N
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 2006No. A04-1045PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
This appeal arises from the condemnation by respondent Cooperative Power Association (CPA) of property belonging to appellants Danny and Mary Lundell (Lun-dells). Lundells opposed CPA’s condemnation petition, arguing that (1) there was no public purpose or necessity for the taking because CPA already had the use and possession of the property through a lease; (2) CPA acted in bad faith by failing to complete negotiations for amendments to the lease; and (3) CPA was not entitled to use the quick take procedures under Minn. Stat. § 117.042 (2004) because it was already in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- City of Duluth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northern States Power Co. v. OslundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- C.O. v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Guardian Energy, LLC, Relator v. County of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- 444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- County of Dakota v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.