Legal Opinion

Wells v. Holley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM GREENE. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Greene County.— Hon. Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. L. D. Smith, Special Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an action for damages based upon an averment of fraud in the sale and purchase of a tract of land by the defendant to complainants. The facts necessary to be stated are:

The defendant A. H. Holley was the owner of a tract of land near Greenville, Tenn., which he desired to sell. He engaged a real estate agency, Tweed & Kelley, to find a purchaser. He represented to his agents that the tract contained one hundred and thirty-six acres, and authorized them to sell it at the price of f15,000. The complainant Wells desired…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graham v. First American National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  2. Derryberry v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. Bright v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Graham v. First American National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API