Fitzpatrick v. Flannagan
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
This is an'action of~assumpsit commenced by Charles M. Flannagan and George M. Flannagan, copartners, doing business under the firm name and style of C. M. & G. M. Flannagan, by the issuing of a writ of attachment, according to the practice as prescribed by the law of Mississippi, they being citizens oi Missouri. The process of attachment was founded on an affidavit, which set forth that John J. Fitzpatrick, as the surviving partner, of the firm of Fitzpatrick Brothers, composed of himself and his brother James C. Fitzpatrick, deceased, was the legal owner of the partnership property; that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Locke v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Schmidlapp & Bros. v. S. D. Currie & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1878
- Roach v. BrannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Leonardi v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Kingman & Co. v. StoddardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.