Legal Opinion

Sowle v. Holdridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Action by tbe appellant against tbe appellee to recover possession of certain land.

Yerdict and judgment for tbe defendant.

Tbe facts involved in tbe case are substantially as follow: On tbe 16th of February, 1844, tbe defendant, Holdridge, purchased tbe land in controversy of Sumner and Clark, who then owned it, at tbe price of 480 dollars, a part of which seems to have been paid down; tbe residue, 400 dollars, was to be paid in four equal annual payments. Sumner and Clark executed to Holdridge a title-bond, conditioned for tbe conveyance of tbe land upon tbe payment of tbe purchase-money. On…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. BranhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Murray v. BethuneNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. Reed v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Sowle v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sowle v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Whitney-Kemmerer v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API