Legal Opinion

Russell v. Branham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1846PublishedCited by 35 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackeord, J.

This was art action of indebitatus assumpsit for 1,000 dollars, the price of a certain contract between the plaintiffs and a canal company, sold by the plaintiff’s to the defendants. The contract sold was respecting section No. 66 of the White' Water Canal. Plea, non assumpsit. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

On the trial, the plaintiffs offered in evidence the article of agreement by which the sale of the canal contract was made by them to the defendants. The evidence was objected to, but was admitted. By this article of agreement, which was *278not under seal, the defendants bound…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Platt v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Duerson v. BellowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Townsend v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API