Russell v. Branham
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackeord, J.
This was art action of indebitatus assumpsit for 1,000 dollars, the price of a certain contract between the plaintiffs and a canal company, sold by the plaintiff’s to the defendants. The contract sold was respecting section No. 66 of the White' Water Canal. Plea, non assumpsit. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.
On the trial, the plaintiffs offered in evidence the article of agreement by which the sale of the canal contract was made by them to the defendants. The evidence was objected to, but was admitted. By this article of agreement, which was *278not under seal, the defendants bound…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Platt v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
- Duerson v. BellowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
3Cited by35 opinions
- City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Townsend v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.