Legal Opinion

Whitney-Kemmerer v. Kearns

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 1925No. 3485PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PACE, Circuit Judge.

In a suit in the municipal court of Chicago to recover unliquidated damages for violation of a contract, defendant, more than four months before its bankruptcy, tendered unconditionally in open court an amount admitted to be *354due. The court ruled that such sum should be received as a tender by the clerk, to be held until the further order of court. Within the four months before defendant was adjudged a bankrupt, judgment was rendered for a much larger sum. The question is: Can the money tendered be reeoyered for the bankrupt estate?

Tenders for unliquidated damages are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sweetland v. TuthillIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Mann v. . SproutNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. People v. McGrathIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Fox v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GaulterIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re JacobyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Fitzgerald v. Somerset County Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Daytona Plaza, Inc. v. HowardCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API