Legal Opinion

Sowle v. Holdridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the S cubm Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins, J..

-In 1844, Dad'ey IloJdridge purchased of Sumner and Clark, a parcel of ground. He agreed to pay for it, in installments, $400; and was to receive a deed when *237foil payment was made. A title bond evidenced the agreement. Iloldridge found himself unable to pay the latter installments of purchase money, and he assigned his title bond to Francis Sowle, who made the payments, and received a deed for the land from Sumner and Ciarle. The assignment of the bond was absolute, and not accompanied by any trust, unless one was created by parol. A controversy afterward arose between Sowle and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sowle v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Sowle v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Ideal Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. MacKowiakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Sowle v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API