Legal Opinion
United States v. McCall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2000No. 99-2166PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANE, Senior District Judge.
The United States filed this appeal after judgment was entered against it in a foreclosure action against Defendant McCall and sanctions imposed. We AFFIRM.
After a bench trial to determine whether the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) 1 was entitled to foreclose against property pledged to secure several notes on which the Defendant had defaulted and collect a 10% surcharge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 8011, the district court entered judgment against the government and in favor of McCall. The district court found the foreclosure action “frivolous and groundless” in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Donald Dean Walker, Debtor. Donald Dean Walker v. Kenneth G.M. Mather, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Velma E. Carr v. James F. Runyan, Elbert Starks, Jr., Linda K. Bloom, Individually and as Auditor of Allen County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Lynch, Inc. v. Samatamason Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Shoels v. KleboldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Makins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Schell v. OXY USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.