Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1982No. 8118SC268PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, summary judgment is proper when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” The purpose of the rule is not to allow the trial court to decide an issue of material fact, but to allow it to determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor, 301 N.C. 200, 271 S.E. 2d 54 (1980). In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Peacock v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Toomer v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Rhoads v. Harvey Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Pittman v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Driggers v. Sofamor, S.N.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API