Avecia, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUSGRAVE, Judge.
As discussed in 469 F.Supp.2d 1269, a certain protest sent to the director for the Port of Philadelphia challenged three entry classifications for products imported through the ports of Newark and Baltimore, in addition to the classification of several other entries through that port. See Avecia, Inc. v. United States, 30 CIT -, 469 F.Supp.2d 1269, 1282-83 (2006). 1 After the protest’s denial, Avecia included it in this suit. 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) provides that this Court has “exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to contest the denial of a protest, in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Netchem, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014