Vereinigte Osterreichische Eisen und Stahlwerke, A. G. v. Modular Building & Development Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that an agreement between it and the defendants is void and unenforceable under the laws of the State of New York, and that arbitration provided for therein should be stayed.
Plaintiff is a large Austrian iron and steel works with offices and employees all over the world. In January, 1965, it entered into a contract with defendants, designers and developers of a modular system of prefabricated construction. Under the agreement defendants granted to the plaintiff an exclusive license to use its designs and information in the manufacture, sale and erection…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bronold v. . EnglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Binford v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Wahlstrom v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Lytle v. GodfirnonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Putnam v. SiravoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Joseph v. David M. Schwarz/Architectural Services, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- SKR Design Group, Inc. v. Yonehama, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Charlebois v. J. M. Weller Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Marshall-Schule Associates, Inc. v. GoldmanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.