Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Mallory Electric Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1977No. 8782PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

Appellant, Pamela Elliott, commenced this action to recover damages from respondents, Mallory Electric Corporation and Laxalt Associates, Inc., dba Ormsby House, for injuries she received in a car accident. A thief stole a car leased by Mallory from where it was parked in front of the Ormsby House in Carson City. Later, while pursued by the police, the thief crashed into the Elliott vehicle, inflicting the damages complained of. The district judge ruled, on a motion for summary judgment, that there was no legal theory upon which the respondents could be held…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Zinck v. WhelanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  4. Myers v. GaitherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. George v. BreisingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Van Cleave v. Kietz-Mill Minit MartNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Merluzzi v. LarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Warmbrodt v. BlanchardNevada Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API