Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGough

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1990No. 6771PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Attorney Joseph E. McGough appeals the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association that he be suspended from the practice of law for 2 years. Upon careful review of the record and prior discipline cases, we conclude that the appropriate sanction is disbarment.

McGough was admitted to practice law in 1976 and has practiced in the Tri-Cities area since 1978, mostly as a sole practitioner. McGough has a prior disciplinary history resulting from conduct in 1984 and 1985, which culminated in his stipulation to two letters of censure in November 1985.1

The current…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AllottaWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KumberaWashington Supreme Court · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API