Legal Opinion
Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 28, 1995No. 95-153CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
This is a government contract case. Plaintiff Aaska Pulp Company (APC), moved for an order directing the contracting officer to issue a final decision on APC’s claims for damages, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 605(c)(4). Defendant United States contends that the motion cannot be granted because the court has not issued a declaration on the propriety of the “default termination” of APC’s contract, the contracting officer lacks authority to consider the claim, and in any event, the contracting officer has not engaged in undue delay.
FACTS
APC and the United States, through the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- The Sharman Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Joseph Morton Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buse Timber & Sales, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.