Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, RCFC 12(b)(1); Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109; Burden of Proof for Jurisdictional Facts Establishing Submission of Claim to Contracting Officer.
ORDER
James F. Merow, Senior Judge
This matter comes before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6). Defendant contends this court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. 1) brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7101 et seq. because plaintiff had not submitted a valid claim to the contracting officer (CO), a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Trailboss Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- FLANDREAU SANTEE SIOUX TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021