Legal Opinion

Hays v. Lusk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1829PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Érror fo the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming county, The circumstances of this case are so fully'developed in the opinion of the. court, that a further report is deemed unnecessary.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.

— The action was originally brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant, before a justice of the peace, who had rendered a judgmient for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming county. On the trial in that court, the plaintiff, in support of his action, gave in evidence two due bills from the defendant and one John Reed to him; one in the following words:-r~

“ Due to the order of John K. Hays, the sum of thirty dollars, on or before the first day of December next, provided the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. GaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1817

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Young v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. United States v. BurkhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. C.A. Ex Rel. G.A. v. Morgan County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
  5. United States v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API