Legal Opinion

Marchand v. Emken

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 25, 1889No. 37PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIIE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. In equity for the infringement of letters patent. Decree' dismissing the bill. Plaintiff appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatciiford

This is a suit in equity, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, by Charles Marchand against Frederick Emken, to recover for the infringement of letters patent No. 273,569, granted to the plaintiff March 6, 1883, for an improvement in the manufacture of hydrogen peroxide.

The specification says: “This invention has reference to the manufacture of hydrogen peroxide, or oxygenated water, by addition of barium, or calcium binoxide to an acid (sulphuric, nitric, acetic, oxalic, hydrochloric, hydrofluoric, hydrofluosilic, and the like), the binoxide…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Crescent Brewing Co. v. GottfriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. CarySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Jones v. General Fireproofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Brush Electric Co. v. Julien Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
  4. In Re RundellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corp. v. Oklahoma Contracting Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API