Legal Opinion

People v. Super. Ct. (Ortiz)

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2022No. E077594Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 7/28/22 See concurring and dissenting opinions CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, E077594 v. (Super.Ct.No. APR12100013) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; JESSICA ORTIZ, Real Party in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ of mandate and/or prohibition. Dean Benjamini, Judge. Petition granted. 1 Michael A. Hestrin, District Attorney, and Emily R. Hanks, Deputy District Attorney, for Petitioner. No appearance by Respondent. Steven L.…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API