Legal Opinion
Kryger v. Panaszy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 9, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of Jane Kryger, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Panaszy in the operation of an automobile which he was driving for his employer, the Maher Bros. Corporation. The case was tried to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff from which the defendants have appealed assigning error in the denial of a motion to set aside the verdict, also in the failure of the court to instruct the jury as requested, the instructions as given, and a ruling on evidence.
From the evidence, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monroe v. Hartford Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Smithwick v. Hall & Upson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Hinch v. ElliottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Feehan v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Engelke v. WheatleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Holderfield v. Rummage Bros. Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Hassett v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Cuneo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.