Legal Opinion

Davis v. Jefferson County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 2010No. 08CV0042; A141921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

This case arises under Measure 49, a law adopted by the voters in 2007. Measure 49 qualifies property for special zoning allowances if, among other things, the right to develop the property vested under the common law. The county determined that claimant’s right to continue development of a residential subdivision had vested and that the subdivision was eligible for the zoning allowance provided under Measure 49. Petitioner petitioned for review of the county decision in circuit court. The reviewing court entered a judgment that affirmed the county decision and dismissed petitioner’s writ of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Salosha, Inc. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Cook v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Waste Not of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API