Legal Opinion

State v. Crook County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 2011No. 08CV0045; A142004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioner, State of Oregon through the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), appeals the circuit court’s judgment in a writ of review proceeding that affirmed respondent Crook County’s 1 determination that respondent Shelley Hudspeth (Hudspeth) has a vested right to complete development of a 59-lot residential subdivision in compliance with county and state waivers issued pursuant to Ballot Measure 37 (2004). 2 On appeal, DLCD contends, inter alia, that the circuit court misconstrued applicable law in sustaining the county’s determination that Hudspeth has a vested right to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF LAND CONSERVATION & DEVT. v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API