Legal Opinion
Perna v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 1938No. Civ. No. 2061PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNARD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from judgments of dismissal following the sustaining of separate de*374murrers to a fourth amended complaint in an action for damages. Two judgments were entered and two notices of appeal filed, which have been presented together. For convenience, the respondent bank and its predecessor will be referred to as the bank, and the respondent Transamerica Corporation will be referred to as the corporation.
The original complaint was filed in March, 1935. The amended complaint alleges that the corporation owned 99 per cent of the stock of the bank; that the bank…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Carr v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Ringwalt v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Charles H. Duell, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Adams v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Morales v. Field, DeGoff, Huppert & MacGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Loughran v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Vargas v. GiacosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bank of America v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.