Legal Opinion

Esteybar v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1971No. L.A. 29822PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

In this case of first impression we are called upon to decide whether a magistrate, pursuant to Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b)(5), 1 may determine that an offense is a misdemeanor without first obtaining the consent of the prosecuting attorney. Since a prosecutor may not be vested with authority to foreclose the exercise of a judicial power, we have concluded that requiring his consent to determine that an offense is a misdemeanor violates the doctrine of separation of powers set forth in article III, section 1, of the California Constitution.

Petitioner, Dolores…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API