Esteybar v. Municipal Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
In this case of first impression we are called upon to decide whether a magistrate, pursuant to Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b)(5), 1 may determine that an offense is a misdemeanor without first obtaining the consent of the prosecuting attorney. Since a prosecutor may not be vested with authority to foreclose the exercise of a judicial power, we have concluded that requiring his consent to determine that an offense is a misdemeanor violates the doctrine of separation of powers set forth in article III, section 1, of the California Constitution.
Petitioner, Dolores…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.