Legal Opinion

Collins v. Stolzenberg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 15, 1997No. 95 Civ. 1232 (JSR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

RAKOFF, District Judge.

On January 9, 1997, a jury found defendants Edward Stolzenberg, Stephen Marchwinski, and Ansley Bacon individually liable on plaintiffs claim, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that they unlawfully terminated her employment in retaliation for her exercising her right of free speech to expose allegedly hazardous health and safety conditions at her workplace. The jury awarded plaintiff $45,-000 in compensatory damages, and the Court thereupon entered judgment. Plaintiff has now applied for costs and attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Specifically, plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Doreen Pino v. Raymond Locascio, New York Hospital, Cornell Medical Center, Westchester DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Lisa Caruso, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. William Forslund and Nicholas Palladino, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. MidAmerica Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marisol A. Ex Rel. Forbes v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Albahary v. City and Town of Bristol, Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  3. Marshall v. State of New York Division of State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  4. Hubbard v. TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API