Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Rusch

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 23, 2004No. 52543-3-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

2Per curiam

— Robert Rusch appeals a commissioner’s order modifying his child support obligation. He argues that the commissioner improperly extrapolated the child support table to calculate the child support obligation. Because the trial court failed to enter findings of fact concerning the basis of using an extrapolated child support obligation, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider whether a factual basis exists for the use of an extrapolated obligation and, if it so decides, to enter findings that support setting child support at a level exceeding the standard calculation.

I

¶2 A…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lambert v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In re the Marriage of LeslieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. In re the Marriage of SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. In re the Marriage of ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of McCauslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re the Marriage of McCauslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. In re the Marriage of DaubertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State ex rel. of M.M.G. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. ZassoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API