Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Clarke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 28, 2002No. 27220-2-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

Michael Clarke appeals from an order increasing the child support obligation for his three children from $956 to $1,537 per month. Michael claims that the commissioner committed two errors during the modification hearing. First, he claims error in the court’s ruling that Wendy Clarke was not voluntarily underemployed when she reduced her hours by 20 percent. Second, he claims that because the parents’ combined income is greater than the $7,000 maximum computed on the child support schedule, the commissioner erred by extrapolating the child support calculation based on the actual total net…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re the Marriage of CrosettoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. In Re the Marriage of SaccoWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re the Marriage of LeslieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. In Re the Marriage of PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of McCauslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re the Marriage of McCauslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. In re the Marriage of DaubertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. In re the Marriage of RuschCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State ex rel. of M.M.G. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API