Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 3, 2000No. 44172-8-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

— Mark Watson and Joanne Schumacher divorced and agreed to a retroactive method for calculating child support. Under this method, Watson’s erratic employment decreased his child support obligations retroactively and caused Schumacher to owe money to Watson. She sought a modification of the child support order to eliminate the retroactive method and to impute income to Watson. The trial court modified the child support order and imputed income to Watson because it found that Watson was voluntarily underemployed and that the previous method created severe economic hardship for his child. Watson…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re the Marriage of SaccoWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dominick v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re the Marriage of OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re the Marriage of PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ScanlonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Mecum v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. In re the Marriage of RaskobCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. In re the Marriage of LarsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Silver Firs Town Homes, Inc. v. Silver Lake Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API