Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Fletcher

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1894No. 476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Hon. James A. Miner, Judge. Action by H. C. Hansen and others against Mark Fletcher and others, to recover the possession and quiet the title of a mining claim, and for an injunction for trespassing upon the same. From 'a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Merritt, C. J.:

This appeal comes to this court upon the judgment roll. It appears from the findings of fact that on the 27th day of October, 1891, the respondents made a mining location known as the “Blue Bock.” The location was made by erecting a rock monument at a point upon the ground known as the “ prospect hole ” or “ discovery shaft,” by placing in the monument a notice of location, which said notice of location is as follows:

“Notice of Location. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, having complied with the requirements of section 2324 of the Revised Statutes of the United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Richmond Mining Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ellers v. BoatmanUtah Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Burke v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. McPherson v. JuliusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Zimmerman v. FunchionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  4. Harper v. HilllCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Stephens v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API