Guinn v. Alburtis Fire Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The issue before this Court is whether Appellant, a volunteer fire company, is entitled to governmental immunity under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541 even when it is not engaged in fire-fighting activity. 1 For the reasons that follow, we find that Appellant is entitled to immunity under Section 8541 even when it is not engaged in fire-fighting activities.
On August 23, 1986, Appellee was served alcohol at the Alburtis Fire Company by employees of the fire company notwithstanding the fact that Appellee was visibly intoxicated at the time. Thereafter, Appellee left the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kusza v. MaximonisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Kusza v. MAXIMONISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Frontini v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Mark v. Borough of HatboroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Mark v. Borough of HatboroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sphere Drake Insurance v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.