McPike v. Die Casters Equipment Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.
Du-Wel Products, Inc. (hereinafter called “Du-Wel”), one of the third-party defendants in this case, has moved for summary judgment against Die Casters Equipment Corporation (hereinafter called “Die Casters”), the third-party plaintiff. Du-Wel’s motion has required this Court to review, evaluate, and harmonize various statutes and cases in an attempt to determine what effect, if any, Michigan’s adoption of the doctrine of pure comparative negligence 1 has on the ability of a manufacturer or supplier of allegedly defective machinery or equipment to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Langley v. Harris Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. Litton Systems, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Van Hook v. Harris Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Die Cutter Repair Service, Inc. v. King Seeley Thermos Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.