Legal Opinion

Langley v. Harris Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1982No. 65966, (Calendar No. 10)PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

This case presents the issue whether a defendant successor corporation in a products liability action is entitled to indemnity from the employer of the injured plaintiff employee. We hold that it is not and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I

Plaintiff William L. Langley was employed by the King-Seeley Thermos Company. He was severely injured when the die-cutting press he was operating allegedly double-tripped. The press was designed, manufactured and sold by the T. W. & C. B. Sheridan Company (Old Sheridan). The Harris Corporation is the successor corporation to Old Sheridan, having…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re Air Crash Disaster.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. City Management Corp. v. U.S. Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Skinner v. DME CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Herbolsheimer v. SMS Holding Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API