Quirk v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
This Industrial Commission matter relates to the technical aspects of a workman’s choice of remedies and the right to relief where the effects of an industrial injury still continue.
Clinton Quirk is an iron worker by trade. Ilis livelihood, except when he is in a supervisory capacity and sometimes even then, often requires the individual to work many feet off of the ground and requires the physical capacity to engage in heavy lifting as well as stooping and bending.
Prior to the accident in question, in 1959 while Quirk was working for Fischer, he sustained an industrial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. FrancisArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Dabbs v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Salmi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- State Compensation Fund v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Fish v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Blickenstaff v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Clark v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.